Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
paul at qub.com
Mon Jan 17 18:48:18 GMT 2000
----- Original Message -----
From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl at simonstl.com>
> At 12:00 AM 1/17/00 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:
> >Again, I've managed our membership to the W3C starting on the most
> >shoe-string of budgets, so "it's too expensive" really rings hollow here.
> >You either commit to it, or you don't.
> For a lot of one-person shops, myself included, $5000/year amounts to a
> tithe (one part in ten) or much worse. Perhaps if I felt a deep religious
> commitment to the Web, I'd be willing to contribute at this level, but I've
> had a hard enough time finding the $250 for OASIS.
There are two classes of membership: Full and Affiliate. The annual fee for Full Members
is $US 50,000. The annual fee for Affiliate Members is $US 5,000. There are no differences
in Member benefits between the two classes of membership. All new Members must commit to a
three-year initial term of membership. After that, membership renews annually.
I think it says that 3 * 5 = $15.000.
PS. Ah, does not matter, does not matter ...
James Clark is still there.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
More information about the Xml-dev