Alternatives to the W3C
tbray at textuality.com
Mon Jan 17 19:38:58 GMT 2000
At 11:23 AM 1/17/00 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> foul! FO spec is unfinished.
>Actually, perhaps that means it's right on the mark. It's
>better to have code (such as FOP? ;-) implementing drafts,
>and turning up bugs therein, than to wait till any sort of
>"Candidate REC" stage to start such work.
And I'm happy to report that there is an implementation in place,
and being madly extended as we write, in the Apache project (see
http://xml.apache.org). Any others? -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
More information about the Xml-dev