Alternatives to the W3C
cbullard at hiwaay.net
Tue Jan 18 18:06:28 GMT 2000
Sean McGrath wrote:
> Amen. I see an increasing number of innovative Web apps in which
> the browser is the "viewer" as distinct from the app that is
> doing the real work.
> I think it is interesting to ponder why this is so.
> My (controversial of course) view on this
> is that the Web client-side programming model of an
> embedded, sand-boxed, buggy,
> antithesis-of-a-text-processing-language has finally
> run its course.
Architecturally, it doesn't always make sense to make HTML the
outer language layer or have a web browser be the framework.
http and other transports should be just services available to
any app. The document centric/flow object model isn't the
only way to do this. Sometimes it makes sense; in other
cases, it is just baggage.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
More information about the Xml-dev