Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)

David Brownell david-b at
Sat Jan 22 06:07:08 GMT 2000

Tim Bray wrote:
> At 09:33 AM 1/21/00 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:
> >If we say that the margin of error of this sample is 10% , it means that at
> >least 31% of the browsers in the population sampled has an XML browser, not
> >bad. So, if we make the right inferences:
> That's only if you think that IE5 counts as an XML browser, realistically.
> I don't. -Tim

Two words:  links, lists.  IE5 handles neither its XML/CSS support.

I happen to use both of them constantly in content I produce.  Doing
without is not an option.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom at the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email at your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list