Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
david-b at pacbell.net
Sat Jan 22 06:07:08 GMT 2000
Tim Bray wrote:
> At 09:33 AM 1/21/00 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:
> >If we say that the margin of error of this sample is 10% , it means that at
> >least 31% of the browsers in the population sampled has an XML browser, not
> >bad. So, if we make the right inferences:
> That's only if you think that IE5 counts as an XML browser, realistically.
> I don't. -Tim
Two words: links, lists. IE5 handles neither its XML/CSS support.
I happen to use both of them constantly in content I produce. Doing
without is not an option.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom at ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email at your-subscribed-address
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
More information about the Xml-dev