Object-oriented serialization (Was Re: Some questions)

[David Megginson]

Matthew Gertner <matthew at praxis.cz> writes:

> David Megginson wrote:

> > How does the schema tell me that foo represents a container for a
> > collection of objects, bar represents an object, and hack and flurb
> > represent the object's properties?
> 
> The point is not what the current schema draft allows, it is whether it
> would be feasible and appropriate to represent this information in XML
> schemas, as Paul rightly stated. My opinion is that it would be fairly
> trivial and extremely useful.

Would you require schema processing, then, for object exchange (or in
other words, would there be no equivalent of the DTD-less XML
document)?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)