[klee-dev] LibC recommendations? [Re: Updating KLEE-uClibc to the most recent version of uClibc]

[Marko Dimjašević]

Hi Cristian,

On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 15:35 +0100, Cristian Cadar wrote:

> However, if the latest available uClibC version is from 2012, I think we 
> should investigate switching to other libC implementations.

This sounds reasonable.


> I see there is a fork of uClibc which is maintained, so this would be 
> one option:
> http://tests.embedded-test.org/uClibc-ng/
> 
> I heard good things about musl too:
> https://www.musl-libc.org/
> I believe Martin has tried it with KLEE.

For the last few days I've been playing with musl. I can compile it to
LLVM IR, at least I believe I managed to do that.

The next step I have in mind is to compile a program against the musl
implementation, and not the default GNU implementation. That seems to be
non-trivial, especially in a setting where I'm compiling to LLVM IR, and
not native code.

I will keep you posted. In case I get it running, that will be great.
I'll also take a look at uClibc-ng.


-- 
Regards,
Marko Dimjašević <marko at cs.utah.edu> .   University of Utah
https://dimjasevic.net/marko         . PGP key ID: 1503F0AA
Learn email self-defense!  https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.ic.ac.uk/pipermail/klee-dev/attachments/20160923/891dd0a6/attachment.sig>