XML API specification
Peter Murray-Rust
Peter at ursus.demon.co.uk
Thu Feb 27 15:28:02 GMT 1997
This is very helpful, thanks.
In message <199702271514.KAA24157 at nathaniel.ebt> gtn at ebt.com (Gavin Nicol) writes:
[...]
> I think for XML, we should probably get more concrete. The question
> is how much more concrete? How much information *must* the API support?
There are possibly two questions here. Do we need to _pass the information_,
and do we need to _have special names_ (rather than just Property). I suspect
that you will find it difficult to get rid of anything below that will
satisfy everyone. My own simple experience is that I would actively use
the following:
> Do we *need*
Element, Y
Attribute, Y
Comment, N (an XML processor _may_, but need not, pass these.
where would they be attached?)
PI, Y
Header, Y
DTD, Y
MarkedSection, N
EntityReference, Possibly, when I get brave
Entity etc. etc?
>
I would, however, be prepared to receive them as Property, so long as they
were clearly documented, and I assume that they might well be subclassed
from Property anyway.
P.
--
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences
http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev
mailing list