XML API specification
gtn at ebt.com
Thu Feb 27 15:48:19 GMT 1997
>There are possibly two questions here. Do we need to _pass the information_,
>and do we need to _have special names_ (rather than just Property). I suspect
>that you will find it difficult to get rid of anything below that will
>satisfy everyone. My own simple experience is that I would actively use
OK. I think this is good arguments for actually defining these
classes, because people who want abstract groves can take these, and
build groves out of them.
>I would, however, be prepared to receive them as Property, so long as they
>were clearly documented, and I assume that they might well be subclassed
>from Property anyway.
Actually, from Node.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev