Open Standards Processes

[Matthew Gertner]

Agreed. When you get right down to it, the same probably goes for unfocused
rambling about inheritance, semantics, etc. (although personally I enjoy it
thoroughly). Anyone interested in setting up xml-pontification? :-)

Matthew

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent <SimonStL at classic.msn.com>
To: Xml-Dev (E-mail) <xml-dev at ic.ac.uk>
Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Open Standards Processes


>The W3C isn't always beautiful, but I think we'd better get back to XML
>discussion instead of W3C discussion before the list masters have to come
out
>and whack us with small sticks.  One of XML-Dev's best features is its
ability
>to stay focused on _XML_.
>
>Unfortunately, I don't know of any good forums for
>discussing/pondering/plotting against/praising the W3C.
>
>Simon St.Laurent
>Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)