Open Standards Processes

Matthew Gertner matthew at
Sat Apr 25 18:42:20 BST 1998

Agreed. When you get right down to it, the same probably goes for unfocused
rambling about inheritance, semantics, etc. (although personally I enjoy it
thoroughly). Anyone interested in setting up xml-pontification? :-)


-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent <SimonStL at>
To: Xml-Dev (E-mail) <xml-dev at>
Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Open Standards Processes

>The W3C isn't always beautiful, but I think we'd better get back to XML
>discussion instead of W3C discussion before the list masters have to come
>and whack us with small sticks.  One of XML-Dev's best features is its
>to stay focused on _XML_.
>Unfortunately, I don't know of any good forums for
>discussing/pondering/plotting against/praising the W3C.
>Simon St.Laurent
>Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as:
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list