Expanded names are not enough

[John Cowan]

Chris Maden scripsit:

> "[W]ill" in what sense?  In the sense that IE 5, developed before the
> current namespace spec does this?  In the sense that you think it
> might.

In the sense of clause 5.4 of CSS2:  "A type selector matches the name
of a document language element type".  The name, not the UniversalName.
 
> The behavior of CSS in the presence of namespaces is undefined.  But I
> have every reason to expect that it will follow the (soon-to-be-)
> defined behavior of XSL, which is that the universal name is
> compared.

"Every reason" as in "reasons you can't talk about"?

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan at ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)