More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)
SimonStL at classic.msn.com
Mon Aug 17 20:03:16 BST 1998
>On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, John Cowan wrote:
> > www.w3c.org is starting to look like Schema-of-the-Month Club.
> The stuff they're publishing is Notes, which means "neat ideas by
> members; W3C doesn't endorse them in any way."
And Dan Brickley wrote:
>It's not all member submission Notes...
>eg. http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-rdf-schema/ (new version as of last week)
>...is the result of a W3C working group for RDF Schemas.
>It addresses some but not yet all of the issues in the TimBL/DanC paper
>and looks, from where I'm standing, to be pretty complimentary to the
>ideas behind the DCD submission.
I hate to say it, but it's looking like the W3C is heading into the "let's get
complicated as quickly as possible" thicket after a fairly refreshing period
that produced XML 1.0. Between RDF and DCD, not to mention namespaces, is a
swirling vortex of bizarrely complicated stuff that describes pretty simple
stuff. XSchema (which will finish this week before a two-week review period)
contributes yet another schema to the soup, so I can't claim I'm innocent,
though simplification was one of my goals.
Still, could somebody slow this stuff down so that XML can have a tiny chance
to grow? We're not even at the first round of browser implementations and
already it looks like XML is attempting self-immolation at the shrine of
complexity. The specs are doing too many things in too many places.
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev