Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?

[Liam R. E. Quin]

On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Joel Bender wrote:

[...]
> I've been adding something like this
> to my XML documents:
> 	<prop name="state" xml:regexp="[A-Z]+">NY</prop>

Note that the xml prefix is reserved, so this is not really kosher.
It's not actually an error, as the spec nowhere says what "reserved" means.

[...]
> Works OK for content, but I don't see how I can add this meta-meta-data for
> attributes.

You could do xml:content="name ~ /pattern/, ~ /pattern/" I suppose.

But a schema would be better.

Lee

-- 
Liam Quin, GroveWare Inc., Toronto;  The barefoot agitator
l i a m q u i n     at    i n t e r l o g    dot   c o m


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)