C++ XML Parser

[Peter Murray-Rust]

At 11:55 16/07/98 +0200, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>
>
>DXP seems to be much slower than the other XML parsers, and informal
>tests done by myself at home had XP parsing documents about 10 times
>faster than DXP. (This test was done on only a single large document
>and with previous versions of both parsers, so your results may be
>different.)
>
I have been using DXP for validation when required and have found that it
is not only slow but can throw OutOfMemoryError for large documents. This
is with a version about 1998-02 - I am not clear whether there is a later
one. [I didn't find a SAX1.0-compliant one last time I looked.]

I normally use AElfred as my non-validating parser under SAX and have
switched to using xml4j for the validating parser which has managed an 11
Mbyte document for me without problems.

	P.

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)