John replies to Ron: Differences
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Thu Jun 4 20:29:22 BST 1998
Ron Bourret wrote:
> Content models of PCDATA and EMPTY represent the terminals in DTDs.
True, but not all data models have finite expansion. HTML
does not, e.g.
> That is, bold, italic, etc. have a PCDATA content model.
Not typically. More likely, each would have a mixed model
so that we can handle italic within bold and vice versa.
7A separate BI element could do that job otherwise, but
that leads to a combinatorial explosion when there are
six or seven appearance tags.
> Furthermore, in more data (as
> opposed to document) applications of XML, PCDATA-only content seems to be
> relatively common.
Perhaps true. But maybe that's a historical artifact due to there
being no standard way to express rich text within databases.
> For the moment, I have left PCData in and required Mixed to
> take at least one ElementRef, per your earlier suggestion.
Okay. BTW, it occurred to me today that SEQ and CHOICE (using
my terminology) should be compelled to have at least two children,
with content models
<!ELEMENT SEQ ((CHOICE | REF), (CHOICE | REF)+)>
<!ELEMENT CHOICE ((SEQ | REF), (SEQ | REF)+)>
Otherwise, we have
all with the same meaning.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev