John replies to Ron: Differences
peter at ursus.demon.co.uk
Thu Jun 4 23:11:34 BST 1998
At 14:28 04/06/98 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>> Furthermore, in more data (as
>> opposed to document) applications of XML, PCDATA-only content seems to be
>> relatively common.
>Perhaps true. But maybe that's a historical artifact due to there
>being no standard way to express rich text within databases.
PCDATA-only content models are likely to be extremely common in many areas
and not necessarily related to their use in databases. I use them all the
time in CML. They are also widely used in the examples in the RDF draft
(e.g. the Dublin Core uses).
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev