Shocking News: Namespaces and Non-Validation
mct at foyt.indyrad.iupui.edu
Wed Sep 9 15:28:19 BST 1998
I was shocked to hear that namespaces invalidate validation.
The problem seems to be that DTD validation does not expand
prefixes, nor does it apply namespace defaulting.
Can you all set me straight?
(Apologies in advance to two knowledgable people who gave me advice on
this subject in private. They unfortunately disagreed with each
other, and now I am at a loss.
I hope you'll tell me that namespaces (esp. namespace defaulting) can
live peacefully with DTD validation.
The problem arises if a document uses <DATE>, with two different
content models. Suppose that in the "alpha" namespace, DATE contains
DAY and MONTH, while in the "beta" namespace, DATE has an attribute v.
Without namespaces, <DATE> would be ambiguous. It would need to
satisfy two different content models.
====================: Validation works with consistent PREFIXES
With prefixes, you could say (with appropriate definitions of the ALPHA
and BETA prefixes)
<ALPHA:DATE> -- This
The above would be valid, if only because a DTD processor could just
ignore the namespace, and treat the element name's as ALPHA:DATE and
================: Validation fails with locally chosen prefixes
Now, suppose the DTD defines
<!ELEMENT KAPPA:DATE (KAPPA:DAY KAPPA:MONTH) >
and the document that uses the "uri:alpha" dtd uses the prefix ALPHA
In this case the document would mention
MY QUESTION: Would a DTD processor figure out that KAPPA:DATE
and ALPHA:DATE are the same element, (since the expansions of KAPPA
and ALPHA are the same?
================: Validation dies when namespace defaults are used
And finally, DTD's seem to die completely if a document uses
namespace defaulting. The DTD validator will not even attempt
to think that the first <DATE> refers to "uri:alpha"+DATE.
But with namespace defaulting
<DATE> -- This is just DATE
<DATE v="tuesday"/> -- This is also just DATE
a DTD processor would not figure out that
<DATE v="tuesday"/> should be from the "beta" DTD,
<DATE> -- This
should be checked against the "alpha" DTD.
MY QUESTION: Is there any hope that namespaces and DTD's
can get along?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev