OO Schemas

[Paul Prescod]

On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Andy Dent wrote:

> At 7:49 AM +0800 17/9/98, Paul Prescod wrote: > >So to me, "inheritance"
between element types would be > ... > > > >Subclassing, on the other hand
> I think it is extremely dangerous to have different definitions for >
subclassing vs inheritance. The chance of confusion is way too high.
Please > use two terms which are less likely to be mixed in communication. 
The fact that theAt 7:49 AM +0800 17/9/98, Paul Prescod wrote:
> >So to me, "inheritance" between element types would be
> ...
> >
> >Subclassing, on the other hand
> I think it is extremely dangerous to have different definitions for
> subclassing vs inheritance. The chance of confusion is way too high. Please
> use two terms which are less likely to be mixed in communication.

The difference in meanings is inherent. The word subtype (perhaps not 
subclass) is very formally defined. The word inherit is perhaps not 
formally defined, but has a very common English-language meaning. There 
is essentially no relationship between those meanings. I don't "inherit" 
my type from my father when he dies. I get "stuff" from him.

It is worth noting that Simula did not call its "class extensions" 
inheritance. 

http://www-leland.stanford.edu/class/cs242/outlines-95/simula.html

I presume that Smalltalk was what changed the names. In Smalltalk, the
difference between inheritance and subclassing would be more or less
irrelevant. In statically typed languages (like XML) the difference is
huge. 

 Paul Prescod


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)