Is validity an option?

[Jonathan Borden]

David:

>
>I think that the "both" case is the most useful one in terms of
>"write once, run anywhere" portable code.
>
    Exactly. This parse tree content based classification (especially
"both") is equally interesting for me as is validation vs. non-validation.
Generation of validation error messages is something the *user* of the
document decides the importance of while the content of a document is
something the *author* is concerned with. Default attributes and entity
expansions look alot like content to me.

Jonathan Borden
http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)