recursion in XML parser

[David Megginson]

Didier PH Martin writes:

 > I think that nobody would argue that Java has a lot of virtues that
 > certainly speed of not one of them. To take your numbers David, If
 > that part of the application is 10 times faster than any Java
 > parser and that the app itself is 10 times faster also. The overall
 > throughput is therefore 10 times faster.

That's not necessarily the case -- C/C++ have some advantages for fast
I/O that Java doesn't share, but if your other code is not I/O-bound,
and if it doesn't require small, tight processing loops, the speed
difference for the non-parsing code might be much less significant
(depending on how efficient your VM and OS are at memory-management).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)