recursion in XML parser
marcelo at mds.rmit.edu.au
Thu Apr 15 05:12:34 BST 1999
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 09:16:06AM -0700, David Megginson wrote:
> Didier PH Martin writes:
> > I think that nobody would argue that Java has a lot of virtues that
> > certainly speed of not one of them. To take your numbers David, If
> > that part of the application is 10 times faster than any Java
> > parser and that the app itself is 10 times faster also. The overall
> > throughput is therefore 10 times faster.
> That's not necessarily the case -- C/C++ have some advantages for fast
> I/O that Java doesn't share, but if your other code is not I/O-bound,
> and if it doesn't require small, tight processing loops, the speed
> difference for the non-parsing code might be much less significant
> (depending on how efficient your VM and OS are at memory-management).
Don't forget string handling. C/C++ handle strings significantly
faster than Java, and this is generally what one would expect to find
in an application who's domain involves parsing XML.
One other thing does perplex me. I would have expected I/O bound
behaviour to level Java and C/C++ rather increase the disparity. I'd
be interested to know the details.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev