david-b at pacbell.net
Thu Apr 15 16:26:28 BST 1999
Julian Reschke wrote:
> > And fourth, DER and BER are examples of a philosophy of protocol
> > development that's been largely discredited for mainstream applications:
> > "bitstuffing". ...
> > Many folk think DER/BER should be the first to be
> > put against the wall when the revolution (XML?) comes; they're
> > that unpleasant to use.
> > ...
> I would be extremely careful with this. There will always be a reason to
> stick as much as data as possible into a your byte stream. Right now people
> pay a premium in both performance and price for IP over cell phones,
That isn't "mainstream", either in quantity or bitrate (14.4Kb).
Consider, though: the DER encoding of 32 bit numbers takes more than
32 bits. One aspect of "bitstuffing" the DER/BER way is what one might
call "The Joy of BitFields" -- used all over the place to flag and tag
data. In this case, bitstuffed != space-efficient.
Note that I wasn't advocating _wasting_ bandwidth. There are systems
where bandwidth is a critical resource ... and it's never completely
free, so it shouldn't be wasted. That's not the same as designing a
protocol down at the bit level.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev