ASN.1

[Mike Spreitzer]

Nigel Hutchison wrote: [[
I would have thought that the best way of dealing with this issue is to use
a "pleasant" syntax which was easy to  process and implement another layer
to compress the payload for transmission.
]]

Best in some contexts, but not all.  The compression layer has runtime
costs, in both code and memory footprint, and processing time.  In some
contexts (e.g., very resource-constrained items like cell phones and Palm
Pilots), these costs can be significant.

Mike


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)