comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?

[khaitan]

try this
http://www.xml.com/pub/Benchmark/exec.html

----- Original Message -----
From: Dean Roddey <droddey at charmedquark.com>
To: <xml-dev at ic.ac.uk>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 1999 7:02 PM
Subject: re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?


> >I'm trying to decide which XML C/C++ parser to use.  Is there any
> comparison
> >available?  In particular, comparison between IBM4C++ and expat.
> >
>
> In my own defense... :-) XML4C2 isn't *that* new by now. Yes, like any
> complex software it has some bugs, but its coming along nicely and its
quite
> flexible as to where you use the 'out of the box' stuff or the 'roll your
> own' stuff (and getting more so.)
>
> As of the new release (2.3, which isn't on Alphaworks yet I don't think
but
> its on the way there), I think we are on about 10 platforms and compiler
> combinations with more being done all the time.
>
> --------------------------
> Dean Roddey
> The CIDLib Class Libraries
> Charmed Quark Software
> droddey at charmedquark.com
> http://www.charmedquark.com
>
> "100% Substance Free. Less Content, more cost. Just the way you like it"
>
>
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on
CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
> To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
> (un)subscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following
message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
>
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)