More chaos coming down the pike

[Paul Prescod]

Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> 
> Why wouldn't you distribute the real source (XMI?)?  That seems better
> than distributing something derived in a standard way from the source.

Only the XMI or the DTD can be canonical. Only one can formally define
the set of legal documents. If it is the XMI then why are fiddling with
a DTD at all? If it is the DTD then you have the version skew problem I
described.

 Paul Prescod

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)