ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
ann at webgeek.com
Mon Aug 30 00:22:52 BST 1999
At 06:11 PM 8/29/99 -0400, Braden N . McDaniel wrote:
>Are you really contesting the popularly accepted notion that modern
>browsers support a greater percentage of HTML 3.2 than of HTML 4.0?
I'm stating that if you try hard enough, you can create something that will
fail in about any language.
In both HTML 3.2 and HTML 4.0, it is perfectly feasiable to design
documents that work as intended. HTML 4.0 does not universally fail. You do
not have to avoid substantial methods that are popularly available to make
it not fail.
But again, let's get back to the issue at hand: is XHTML 1.0 something that
should go to Rec.
Author: Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Buy it Online! http://www.webgeek.com/about.html
Owner, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev