SAX/C++: GCJ and CNI
david-b at pacbell.net
Wed Dec 29 20:00:35 GMT 1999
Steinar Bang wrote:
> >>>>> David Brownell <david-b at pacbell.net>:
> > ... there _will_ be multiple SAX/C++ bindings.
> Well,... personally I'll follow the binding that David Megginson and
> James Clark finally comes up with, no matter what it looks like
> (ie. no matter whether I like everything in it or not).
Lots of folk will make similar choices. I heard voices already
pointing out they couldn't use a binding that didn't work on their
old funky nonstandard "C++" system, for example, regardless whether
it's a "blessed" API or not.
That's all I meant whan I said there "_will_" be multiple bindings.
SAX/Java hit a window of opportunity. SAX/C++ missed one, IMHO,
so it's guaranteed plenty of competition. Bindings generated right
from the Java code are not, and will not, be the only other options.
p.s. No comments on the CNI binding itself?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev