SAX/C++: GCJ and CNI
sb at metis.no
Thu Dec 30 00:19:59 GMT 1999
>>>>> David Brownell <david-b at pacbell.net>:
> Steinar Bang wrote:
>> >>>>> David Brownell <david-b at pacbell.net>:
>> Well,... personally I'll follow the binding that David Megginson and
>> James Clark finally comes up with, no matter what it looks like
>> (ie. no matter whether I like everything in it or not).
> Lots of folk will make similar choices. I heard voices already
> pointing out they couldn't use a binding that didn't work on their
> old funky nonstandard "C++" system, for example,
I've made a lot of noises like that, which is why I've felt the need
to make my position clear a couple of times. I wouldn't want my
objections to slow down of convergence towards a standard.
> p.s. No comments on the CNI binding itself?
Umm... I think I would prefer something more native C++-like as the
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev