Streams, protocols, documents and fragments
Tom Harding
tomh at thinlink.com
Wed Feb 24 22:16:12 GMT 1999
David Megginson wrote:
> More importantly, you don't want to have to parse an entire document
> just to find out where it ends because that forces your system into
> linear processing -- on a busy server, it is absolutely necessary to
> be to isolate the documents/packets quickly and pass them off to
> separate threads (or even separate boxes) for parsing and processing.
Good point. I have been implicitly assuming this as a cost of moving the parsing function into
the network infrastructure. However, a general-purpose endpoint implementation would have a
hard time parallelizing in the way you describe because of possible inter-document dependencies
in the application protocol. It has to deliver the documents to the next layer in the order in
which they were sent. If parallelism is explicitly needed then a solution is to create
multiple connections.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev
mailing list