XML media types revisited
jborden at mediaone.net
Fri Jan 15 04:04:23 GMT 1999
Simon, et al.,
On the other hand, the fact that DTD's exist obviates the need for xml MIME
subtypes. text/xml is sufficiently expressive, and when not text/xxx will
do. I mean its text/html, not sgml/html. The fact is, xml is text plain and
JABR Technology Corp.
> At 11:26 AM 1/15/99 +1000, James Robertson wrote:
> >Who decides which DTDs have sufficient merit/useage/stability/etc
> >to warrant a registered subtype?
> >It seems unrealistic to expect IETF to make those sort
> >of decisions.
> >Or, to rephrase again:
> >If I write a new DTD for (say) classifying house bricks,
> >to be used in the building industry, and I go to to the
> >IETF, and say:
> > Give me a registered subtype!
> >What should they do and say?
> Same as they do for everyone else. See:
> for details, unless it's been revised since. It doesn't look too painful.
> Looking through my Netscape settings, it seems like the x- types are used
> without too much concern. Unless you hit a naming conflict, registration
> doesn't really matter. It doesn't seem like a large problem.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev