XML media types revisited

[David LeBlanc]

Hi;

I don't agree with the idea that XML is a replacement for ASCII. ASCII is
just one means of encoding character data; EBCDIC and Unicode are others
(encoding in the sense of assigning a code to a character glyph). To me,
"text" does not imply the underlying represtentation/encoding. In fact,
although XML is based on Unicode, there are no technical reasons that I
know of why XML could not be represtented in EBCDIC or ASCII (aside from
standard compliance).

Neither does "application" imply C, C++, Java or whatever else. In fact, I
wonder if "application/xml" is appropriate at all - does "application/RTF"
or "application/TROFF" make sense?

Sincerely,

Dave LeBlanc

At 01:08 PM 1/14/99 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
<snip>
>I don't expect the IETF to change this anytime soon, but it does seem like
>something that could stand improvement.  XML isn't really a text format -
>Tim Bray used to say, it's a replacement for ASCII.  I'm inclined to agree
>with him here, and think that maybe XML deserves to be placed on the same
>footing as ASCII, not underneath it.
>
>Simon St.Laurent
>XML: A Primer / Cookies
>Sharing Bandwidth 
>Building XML Applications (March)
>http://www.simonstl.com
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)