OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round

Borden, Jonathan jborden at mediaone.net
Thu Jan 21 16:30:42 GMT 1999


> >
> > If the validity of a standard is based on the process which
> defines it, I
> > suspect that
> > the work done on xml-dev has the greater validity.
> >
> > Open Source Software and vendor controlled standards bodies, IMHO, are a
> > poor marrage.

	Not always, take JPEG for example, a standard with an excellent reference
implementation.

> > The advantage of Java and XML is that they let you do significant work
> > without the need
> > for a large team effort. Agreement and support of a few large vendors is
> > no longer the
> > significant factor.

	Same for JavaScript and XML or C++ and XML for that matter.
> >
> > We need standards. But I suspect the process needs to be updated.
> >
> 	 Currently our standards as defined by the W3C (and other
> standards bodies) are defined by effectively locking a group of
> "members" in
> a room and waiting until they emerge with something worthwhile. ... The
"members"
> tend to be large corporations who have a vested interest in the technology
> (yes, I know Tim is the exception here).

	There are smart and capable people at large corporations, small start-ups
and individuals. Perhaps a better solution would be to provide more
flexibility in the standards organization or WG membership. If people are
donating their time and contributing code, their ought not be a large
financial donation required as well. But that's politics.

>
> 	Is this neccessarily a bad thing? I don't know - we've never really
> experienced anything different. And yet when I compare it to the software
> world, and read "The Cathedral and The Bazaar", I can't help wondering if
> developing standards in a Bazaar might be a better model. It
> would certainly
> be interesting to try.
>
> 	Matt.

	Compare SAX vs. DOM for a direct example. Both have their places.

Jonathan Borden
http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)




More information about the Xml-dev mailing list