OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Thu Jan 21 19:47:51 GMT 1999
Matthew Sergeant (EML) wrote:
> Having said all this I do think the XML spec is a triumph of a
> closed team, although I personally would have disposed of <!NOTATION>...
IMHO the objections to notations are really reactions to the
failure of the XML spec to explain its purpose: datatyping.
A notation can be applied to the #PCDATA content of an element
(via a NOTATION attribute) or to an external file. The general
failure to understand this causes new mechanisms for datatyping to be
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev