OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
paul at prescod.net
Fri Jan 22 03:30:23 GMT 1999
"Matthew Sergeant (EML)" wrote:
> - Given a large enough beta-tester and co-developer base, almost
> every problem will be characterised quickly, and the fix obvious to someone.
> If the process just occured on ordinary public mailing lists this
> would be true I think.
That is not true. There were many bugs found in XML months after it was
available on a public mailing list. Characterizing bugs in specifications
is much, much harder than characterizing them in code. It wouldn't be so
hard if the specs were more formal, but that isn't the way things are
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
"You have the wrong number."
"Eh? Isn't that the Odeon?"
"No, this is the Great Theater of Life. Admission is free, but the
taxation is mortal. You come when you can, and leave when you must. The
show is continuous. Good-night." -- Robertson Davies, "The Cunning Man"
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev