SAX: Next Round

Bill la Forge b.laforge at jxml.com
Fri Jan 22 16:55:21 GMT 1999


>I don't mean to sounds dismissive, but I think it's so important to
>get SAX 2.0 right that the implications for MDSAX and ParserFilter
>should IMHO be completely disregarded.


Agreed. I'll admidt that, since MDSAX is still being finalized, I've been
looking at the short-term compatibility issues. If we get it right, MDSAX
could be a lot of fun. And at this point, I think we are very very close.

Bill


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)




More information about the Xml-dev mailing list