Why SAX needs namespace support

[james anderson]

i suspect i stand in a (very small) minority on this issue, but with respect
to the diagram (http://www.simonstl.com/articles/layering/layered2.gif.) the
"namespace transformation" should appear at least above "attribute
defaulting". i fear i stand in an even smaller minority on the second claim -
that it belongs above entity resolution. perhaps not in the current spec, but
time will tell.

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> 
...
> 
> For a discussion of how this might work, see my rough essay "Toward A
> Layered Model for XML", available at
> http://www.simonstl.com/articles/layering/layered.htm.  If you just want a
> quick look at a picture that adds namespace support to a possible set of
> layered event-based processes, see


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)