Why SAX needs namespace support
simonstl at simonstl.com
Tue Jan 26 19:36:55 GMT 1999
At 07:27 PM 1/26/99 +0100, james anderson wrote:
>i suspect i stand in a (very small) minority on this issue, but with respect
>to the diagram (http://www.simonstl.com/articles/layering/layered2.gif.) the
>"namespace transformation" should appear at least above "attribute
>defaulting". i fear i stand in an even smaller minority on the second claim -
>that it belongs above entity resolution. perhaps not in the current spec, but
>time will tell.
You certainly could put it above attribute defaulting if you liked; part of
what I'm proposing is putting that kind of control in the hands of the
application developer rather than the parser author. Personally, I use
attribute defaults for most of my namespace declarations, but your
situation may definitely vary.
Time will certainly tell. Hopefully, it will be merciful.
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (March)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev