Namespace URI address resources

[David Megginson]

Rick Jelliffe writes:

 > A schema that would be useful for document construction should
 > include human-readable comments, the ability of one attribute to
 > enable another, specifying the end types of reference, etc.
 > Newbies ask predictable questions about structures; the draft has
 > not addressed those questions.

Rick makes a very good point -- the schema requirements for authoring
and validation/processing are very different.  Additional complexity
comes from the fact that there is also an n:n relationship also
between authoring and processing schemas: a document created using any
given authoring schema may match n validation schemas, and vice-versa.

The main point, I think, is that it would be a mistake to try to force
any kind of 1:1 relationship onto XML documents and their
schemas/stylesheets, etc.  by using the Namespace URI to locate a
single, canonical schema.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)