Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?

[Bill la Forge]

This would force the use of fully qualified names and create 
name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing 
the classes being used.

I try hard to avoid such potential name conflicts and would prefer
XParser, ExParser, Parser2, ModParser, OpenParser, or anything else 
over Parser.

Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan <cowan at locke.ccil.org>
To: xml-dev at ic.ac.uk <xml-dev at ic.ac.uk>
Date: Saturday, March 13, 1999 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?


>Bill la Forge scripsit:
>> 
>> Should we just stick with ModSAX/ModParser?
>> Should we change to OpenSAX/OpenParser?
>
>I support OpenSAX/Parser, in other words keeping the names of the
>classes and interfaces the same, and changing the package name only.
>
>-- 
>John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
> e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)