Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Mon Mar 15 14:52:30 GMT 1999
Bill la Forge wrote:
> This would force the use of fully qualified names and create
> name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing
> the classes being used.
I suppose if you use "import org.xml.sax.*;" then you have
a problem, yes, because you can't just add "import org.xml.opensax.*;"
to it. But if you import individual class names it's no problem:
if you use opensax.Parser, you never need to refer to sax.Parser
any more, since it is subsumed.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev