Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?

John Cowan cowan at
Mon Mar 15 14:52:30 GMT 1999

Bill la Forge wrote:

> This would force the use of fully qualified names and create
> name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing
> the classes being used.

I suppose if you use "import org.xml.sax.*;" then you have
a problem, yes, because you can't just add "import org.xml.opensax.*;"
to it.  But if you import individual class names it's no problem:
if you use opensax.Parser, you never need to refer to sax.Parser
any more, since it is subsumed.

John Cowan		cowan at
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list