XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

[Jelks Cabaniss]

Tim Bray wrote:

> Lots of people have good solid practical uses for namespaces.  Anyone who
> thinks that HTML can go forward standing alone in glorious isolation and
> never being mixed with another tag vocabulary Just Doesn't Get It.

The How, not the What, is what's contentious.  Look at this list for the last
several months.  Do we need that to hold back xHTML 1.0 for another three months
or more?

/Jelks



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)