XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

[Ann Navarro]

At 09:58 PM 11/3/99 -0500, Jelks Cabaniss wrote:
>Tim Bray wrote:
>
>> Lots of people have good solid practical uses for namespaces.  Anyone who
>> thinks that HTML can go forward standing alone in glorious isolation and
>> never being mixed with another tag vocabulary Just Doesn't Get It.
>
>The How, not the What, is what's contentious.  Look at this list for the last
>several months.  Do we need that to hold back xHTML 1.0 for another three
months
>or more?

Nothing in any of this suggests it will be held back for 3+ months. The
group has been planning for a variety of contingencies, and is prepared to
turn this around very rapidly (read weeks, if even that, not months). 

Ann
--
Ann Navarro
Author: Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials, 
Due 10/99 - Mastering XML,12/99 HTML By Example, 2nd Ed.

Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com/
Director, Online Education-HTML Writers Guild, http://www.hwg.org/


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)