XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

[Don Park]

><html:table><html:title/></html:table>
>
>And thanks to the one line spec, this is now legal. What the 

There is an arguable common sense when we refer to a document as
'HTMLish' and I believe your example violates that.  If people are
going to abuse namespace like that, it is our job to knock some
sense into them rather than wrap them up in diapers and ducktape
everything with foams.  IMHO, I must say.

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark at docuverse.com
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)