XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

David Megginson david at megginson.com
Fri Nov 5 00:46:37 GMT 1999

"Don Park" <donpark at docuverse.com> writes:

(that Paul Prescod writes that)

> ><html:table><html:title/></html:table>
> >
> >And thanks to the one line spec, this is now legal. What the 

Actually, it's neither legal nor illegal, simply unspecified.

(and Don writes)

> There is an arguable common sense when we refer to a document as
> 'HTMLish' and I believe your example violates that.  If people are
> going to abuse namespace like that, it is our job to knock some
> sense into them rather than wrap them up in diapers and ducktape
> everything with foams.  IMHO, I must say.

Just so -- in the end, it's simple peer pressure that forces
interoperability.  That's a terrifying thought for standards writers,
but it's also the explanation for why scarcely any of the 18 W3C
Recommendations at 


have actually been widely implemented so far (CSS1, XML, and maybe DOM
-- anything else?).  We won't even start counting the WDs...

It's nice, then, that there's a lot of pressure for implementors to
conform to the XML REC, but things don't always work that way: after a
few years' observation, we can safely say that there is little peer
pressure for industry to pay much attention to the W3C's HTML specs,
since there's only a miniscule amount of conformant HTML 3.* or 4.*
out there.

All the best,


David Megginson                 david at megginson.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list