SML answers for SML problems

Sean Mc Grath digitome at
Sat Nov 13 11:03:30 GMT 1999

[Don Park]
>If 0% of SGML is TEXT then 4% seems useful enough. <g> Frankly,
>I am still not sure if SML has enough momentum to fly.  I am
>just talking the talk and walking the walk to see if where it
>leads.  Ideas tend to have a mind of its own.

Unfortunately, 0% of SGML is completely incompatible
with 0.1% of SGML. Same goes for XML.

What I mean is that plan text is not a subset
of SGML or XML. If XML is the new ASCII wouldn't
it be great if it was backwardly compatible with
the existing ASCII?

To be concrete. I think it makes a lot of sense
to allow a plain text document to parse and
emerge at the far end of an XML processor
as a single xml:text node consisting

>From a software development perspective this
appeals to be. I make text processing tools
such as, say, XML-aware search tools, yet
know that I can use em to process plain
text without any code changes.


<Sean uri="">
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list