SML answers for SML problems
donpark at docuverse.com
Fri Nov 12 23:57:19 GMT 1999
>Funnily enough, if you go back 3 years, and substitute "SGML" for
>"XML" and "XML" for "SML", you get the discussions many of us
>were having about why XML was an advantage over SGML...
>mostly, that XML was what most people thought SGML was, or
>should have been.
>So SML is 20% of 20% of SGML? Hmmm, does 4% of SGML
>deliver 64% of the usefulness?
If 0% of SGML is TEXT then 4% seems useful enough. <g> Frankly,
I am still not sure if SML has enough momentum to fly. I am
just talking the talk and walking the walk to see if where it
leads. Ideas tend to have a mind of its own.
Don Park - mailto:donpark at docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev