SGML, XML and SML
reschke at medicaldataservice.de
Sat Nov 20 17:33:02 GMT 1999
> From: owner-xml-dev at ic.ac.uk [mailto:owner-xml-dev at ic.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
> David Megginson
> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 2:14 PM
> To: xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: SGML, XML and SML
> Sean McGrath <digitome at iol.ie> writes:
> > Any SML doc is an XML doc but not the other way around.
> > SML < XML < SGML
> That gets you into the subset dilemma: all conformant XML processors
> will be able to handle SML, but not all conformant SML processors will
> be able to handle XML.
Why would that be a dilemma? That was exactly the goal, correct?
I really think it would be A Good Thing to have a common name for XML minus
a list of features...
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev