[SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?

Don Park donpark at docuverse.com
Sat Nov 27 03:24:26 GMT 1999

>> I think it is clear that attributes are needed under
>> the 'tradition' view of markup where all character
>> data is considered to be 'content'.  I think this
>> view is just as dangerous and restricting as the
>> 'sacred main document structure' view.
>Don't get me wrong. I have no problem with dropping attributes 
>in SML. What
>I was objecting to in the XML.COM article was the view that 
>attributes were
>a mistake in SGML in the first place.

Heh.  Thanks for the 'smackeroo', James.  That will teach me
to skipover a paragraph or two. <g>

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark at docuverse.com
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list