[SML] SML compatibility with XML. ( Preliminary EBNF v0.2 )
digitome at iol.ie
Sun Nov 28 19:54:40 GMT 1999
[Paul Tchistopolskii <paul at qub.com>]
>I don't think anybody realy wants to avoid XML compability.
>As far as I remember, in the original SML posting
>Don was talking about the susbset of XML and
>I think the objective remains the same. Right ?
"Subset" is the killer word here. Is means
different things to different people. In
an SML context "simple" also means different
things to different people. Simple for
programmers, simple for content creators,
I am particularly fond of the way the word
"subset" has been abused in WAP which has
"extended subset" of ECMA262. Go figure!
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev