XHTML & Schemas

[James Tauber]

> That's well and good, but we can't wait until the XSchema recommendation
is
> finalized. XHTML is due to be finalized much earlier, and as we've seen it
> depends on what the decision in XSchema will be. I don't know how the W3C
> process handles such a conflict. What will happen if XHTML makes a
decision,
> and the XSchema draft then changes so it no longer makes sense?

Which is one reason why I think XHTML should perhaps go with zero namespaces
for now and the W3C should address the broader issue ASAP. Although, it
could be said that the W3C *has* addressed the issue and he has already made
his mind up :-)

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)