XHTML & Schemas
david at megginson.com
Thu Sep 2 21:10:03 BST 1999
Paul Prescod writes:
> David Megginson wrote:
> > > The quoted section 4.1 of the XSchema draft seems to directly
> > > contradict his view of what's right, so XML did not "get it
> > > right". Am I missing something again?
> > Yes -- XML-Schema is not XML. XML-Schema is (currently) getting it
> > wrong, but they're in the early drafts, so I still hope for their
> > redemption.
> I don't know what you are talking about. A schema rule is inherently
> triggered based on hooks within the document. What could be a more
> natural hook than the universal name for an element type?
Perhaps I misremembered the original excerpt -- I thought that it had
to do with the Namespace URI pointing to the schema. I agree that
schemas should define rules for qualified names.
All the best,
David Megginson david at megginson.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev